October 05, 2002
Anti-satellite Warfare Could Ruin Low Earth Orbit?

According to Joel Primack writing in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists a really big dust-up in low Earth orbit caused by anti-satellite weapons could render LEO unusable for satellites:

But in reality, space does not clear after an explosion near our planet. The fragments continue circling the Earth, their orbits crossing those of other objects. Paint chips, lost bolts, pieces of exploded rockets—all have already become tiny satellites, traveling at about 27,000 kilometers per hour, 10 times faster than a high-powered rifle bullet. A marble traveling at such speed would hit with the energy of a one-ton safe dropped from a three-story building. Anything it strikes will be destroyed and only increase the debris.

With enough orbiting debris, pieces will begin to hit other pieces, fragmenting them into more pieces, which will in turn hit more pieces, setting off a chain reaction of destruction that will leave a lethal halo around the Earth. To operate a satellite within this cloud of millions of tiny missiles would be impossible: no more Hubble Space Telescopes or International Space Stations. Even communications and GPS satellites in higher orbits would be endangered. Every person who cares about the human future in space should also realize that weaponizing space will jeopardize the possibility of space exploration.

To a scientist whose research has benefited enormously from space observations, these prospects are horrifying. Many of the important astronomical satellites are in low Earth orbit (from the lowest practical orbits—about 300 kilometers—to about 2,000 kilometers above the Earth). The Cosmic Background Explorer, which operated from 1989 to 1994, is at 900 kilometers and the Hubble Space Telescope is at about 600 kilometers.

In addition, most Earth-observing satellites are also in low Earth orbit, both those that study changes in climate and vegetation and those for military surveillance. Low orbits permit the highest-resolution imaging, and are also easiest to reach with existing launch vehicles.

Unfortunately it is probably impossible for treaties to prevent the inevitable development of anti-satellite weapons. US adversaries such as China see US military satellites as high priority targets in any future conflict with the US. The history of arms control treaty cheating (eg the massive Soviet biological weapons program) suggests that only countries that want to obey treaties will do so - especially among the less democratic and less open nations.

What would be interesting to know is whether any low cost techniques could be developed for doing clean-up after massive amounts of small fragments were released into LEO. Could one make, for instance, large very thin sheets unfolded and moved around in orbit (perhaps using solar wind?) to try to get fragments to collide with them? Every collision - even if the collisions punch right thru the thin sheets - is going to rob a fragment of momentum. Rob of them of enough momentum and they will fall out of orbit.

Share |      Randall Parker, 2002 October 05 03:57 PM  Airplanes and Spacecraft


Comments
pat said at March 2, 2005 6:11 AM:

perhaps these anti-satellite weapons should just fry the curciutry of the enemy satellite and make it useless, then the anti-satellite satellite just nudges the fried satellite into earths atmosphere and it burns up and doesn't create a hazard to space travel and other satellites. just leave the satellites that actually physically blow something up for hitting targets on earth.

Josh said at December 15, 2005 2:20 PM:

I also agree that space weapons can be very dangerous. But it is also inevitable that they will be used, but what I think is that most of these "particles" in space are going to be in some way metalic, well, why not have some way to use magnets to collect them. Or even a magnetic field of some sort. That way they can be collected, or even slowed down, so that they would then either be able to be reused, or fall to earth as a result of the lack of speed?

abc said at January 19, 2006 6:26 AM:

And how will you bring the magnet down.???
The Magnet will itself become a bigger particle that would cause more destruction by concentrating the othr iron particles.
Be precise man. The idea is good. But unless you specify the entire implementation plan. It/s useless.

A said at July 18, 2006 12:04 AM:

let north korea launch missile to hit in MOSCOW, IRAN / IRAQ, CHINA,,,
let china launch missile to hit in MOSCOW, IRAN / IRAQ, NORTH KOREA,,,
let iran / iraq launch missile to hit in MOSCOW, NORTH KOREA, CHINA,,,
let moscow launch missile to hit russia' s own land of ussr russia MOSCOW,
NORTH KOREA, CHINA, IRAN / IRAQ,,,


LET AMERICA KEEP WATCH OUT THE WORLD ENEMY MISSILES,,,
LET AMERICA MAKE MORE SDIs ( STAR WARS LASER WEAPON OUTER SPACE ),,,
LET AMERICA MAKE MORE MX MISSILES TO HIT IN MOSCOW, IRAN / IRAQ, CHINA, NORTH KOREA,,,

people around the world,,,
please read this message,,,
DO NOT GO TO CHINA OLYMPICS IN 2008,,,
yes time is boycott,,,
BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT,,,
let forget it about china olympics,,,
china olympics are NOT worth it,,,

AMERICANS PEOPLE AND PEOPLE ALL OVER THE WORLD,
DO NOT GO VISIT IN USSR RUSSIA,,,
USSR RUSSIA DID HELP ALOT TO CHINA, CUBA, INDIA, IRAN / IRAQ,
NORTH KOREA ABOUT ANTI- AMERICA,,,YES RUSSIA DID THAT,,,
RUSSIA IS A EVIL EMPIRE COUNTRY AND LEADER OF TROUBLEMAKER
IN THE WORLD,,,

AMERICAN BILL GATES AS MICROSOFT COMPUTER COMPANY,
DO NOT SEND SELL COMPUTER MICROSOFT WINDOWS TO CHINA, CUBA,
USSR RUSSIA, INDIA, IRAN / IRAQ, NORTH KOREA,,,

Post a comment
Comments:
Name (not anon or anonymous):
Email Address:
URL:
Remember info?

                       
Go Read More Posts On FuturePundit
Site Traffic Info
The contents of this site are copyright ©