May 25, 2004
Spherical Airships May Do Border Patrol And Telecommunications

Hokan Colting, founder of 21st Century Airships Inc., (check out the main page picture) is interviewed by New Scientist magazine about his spherical airship design and high altitude record for lighter-than-air manned airship operation.

What's the highest you've flown in it?

We took it up to 6234 metres (20,450 feet), which is the world record for airships. Traditional airships can only go up to about 1540 metres. After that, we descended, and sat in the cabin with the door open and had lunch.

...

Who's going to want these airships?

High-altitude airships will be used for wireless telecommunications. For a signal to go from the ground to a geostationary satellite and down again, it's a round trip of 70,000 kilometres. Even at the speed of light, that still creates a delay. Or else you put up all these telephone towers everywhere.

A Georgia-based company, Techsphere Systems International LLC, has licensed the 21 Century Airships technology to build unmanned airships and expects to begin production in July 2004.. The spherical approach is seen as having advantages for high altitude loitering applications.

At sea level, the spherical airship will always have more drag than a traditional, cigar-shaped airship. However, for high altitude flying in an air density of approximately 6% that at sea level, the difference in drag between a spherical and a cigar-shaped airship is negligible. At an altitude of 65,000 ft., the spherical airship can achieve speeds exceeding 90 knots.

The AeroSphere has a dual envelope system. The outer envelope is load bearing and the inner envelope contains the lifting gas. When the inner envelope is fully expanded, the airship is at pressure altitude; meaning it cannot climb higher without valving some lifting gas. The air inside the envelope is slightly pressurized by electric blowers to maintain the airship's shape and resist deformation from wind loads.

For a high altitude airship, operating at 60 - 70,000 ft., the envelope must be sufficiently large enough to accommodate the 1,600 - 1,700 % lifting gas expansion. At lift-off, the inner envelope is only filled to 6% of its total volume (Fig. 2). The remaining 94% is filled with air at a slight (over) pressure.

During the climb to altitude, the lifting gas will expand, eventually occupying approximately 85% of the total volume (Fig. 3). At the designed operational altitude, the platform will have enough space to expand with temperature increase during daytime sun exposure.

The spherical airship has no balancing problems at any stage of “fullness”. The weight of the payload is at the center/bottom and the lift vector is directly above this with all the forces acting on the central vertical axis.

The AeroSphere is powered by a hybrid electric system. Thin film solar cells provide power during the daytime with turbo diesel engines that power back-up generators and a small compressor (engine is started with compressed air) for night time power. Very large, lightweight propellers provide sufficient thrust to keep the airship on station.

What is not clear is just how much energy do they think the airship will have to expend to maintain a fairly fixed position at high altitude. Can they move it up and down in altitude to catch winds blowing in different directions? Or can the solar cells power a propulsion system to maintain a stationary position?

Border surveillance and wireless communications are among the expected applications of this approach.

Our High Altitude Spherical Airship, the AeroSphere, is designed as a platform with significant payload capacity suitable for stationary, long endurance, unmanned operations at an altitude between 60,000’ and 70,000’MSL. This places them above the highest winds and weather systems and out of the way of commercial air traffic. And unlike satellites, these platforms can easily be retrieved and payload packages can be recovered and upgraded for further use.

Low and Mid Altitude Airships operate below 35,000'MSL. Depending on payload and application, these AeroSpheres will range in size from 60' to 140' in diameter. These lower level airships are ideal for military applications ranging from surveillance to troop support and homeland security applications such as border patrol and port security. These airships are designed for both manned and unmanned modes of operation.

The key attribute to effectively providing support for these applications is Long Endurance. The ability to loiter for days, weeks or even months at a time in an assigned position or "box". This is the advantage of Lighter Than Air (LTA) technology. To efficiently provide wireless communications to a very large geography. To provide the "unblinking stare" for surveillance and reconnaissance. To know when a suspected mobile chemical lab has moved from one area to another. This is the unique ability of the AeroSphere.

...

The solution is AeroSphere High Altitude Airships. A single AeroSphere at an altitude of 20km can provide effective wireless coverage to an area the size of Virginia, Washington, D.C., West Virginia and Maryland. (see diagram to the left). This is the effective wireless foot print at a 5 to 90 degree angle of elevation. Attenuation from weather is also a major consideration in building tower based networks. Due to the angle of elevation to the AeroSphere, signals will experience far less rain attenuation as compared to terrestrial networks.

If this type of airship can put an end to cell phone cut-offs I for one will be very grateful. I am currently averaging one cut-off phone conversation a day from someone on a cell phone who is either moving or in an area with poor coverage.

By Randall Parker at 2004 May 25 02:04 PM  Airplanes and Spacecraft | TrackBack

Comments
daniel duffy said at May 26, 2004 05:40 AM:

If you like spherical airships, you're going to love the concept of "airship to orbit". Read about the Ascender airship and Dark Sky stratospheric "space station" at:

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5025388/

http://www.jpaerospace.com/atohandout.pdf

http://www.habitablezone.com/space/messages/324949.html

I'd like to see your take on the concept in a future article. At the risk of appearing overly enthusiastic, this has to be the most inexpensive, simple, elegant and stately (not to mention inherently safe) means of entering Earth orbit. As Robert Heinlein once remarked, once you get into orbit you are half way to anywhere in the solar system.

Engineer-Poet said at May 27, 2004 01:12 PM:

Nonsense.  The cost figures quoted thus far (that I've seen) are from Jerry Pournelle, whose figure is $1/ton-mile.  Not per ton, per ton-mile.  How many miles is it to orbit when your ascent takes 5 days?

This leaves me incredulous, because of the inevitable factors of:

  1. Large frontal area of any vehicle which can operate as an aerostat.

  2. The consequent high drag/weight of any such vehicle.

  3. The low thrust of the ion drives touted for propulsion.

  4. The high mass of the required power supplies to operate the ion drives (the ion drive of Deep Space One required ~2 KW to produce 77 millinewtons of thrust).

I think these guys are running a scam.

Randall Parker said at May 27, 2004 01:22 PM:

EP, One big problem with any slow method of taking humans into space is that you have to feed and provide a suitable environment to those humans on the way up. So you have to bring along food and other supplies that are consumed on the way up. The "bean pole" nanotube into space has the same problem because ascent on it will be quite slow.

Now, if you are just bringing up supplies then how long it takes matters far less. But slow human transport costs because you have to run a life-supporting environment on the way up.

A lighter-than-air vehicle wouldn't have to accelerate initially. It could float up to a very high altitude just using its boyancy before finally kicking in a propulsion system. In theory one could lift a rocket to a very high altitude and then release it. Whether that makes sense to do I have no idea.

Getting back to my original posting topic: I also still do not understand the costs of keeping a spherical airship stationary at a high altitude.

Engineer-Poet said at May 28, 2004 02:19 PM:

In theory one could lift a rocket to a very high altitude and then release it.

That's called a rockoon, and while it does work well to reduce losses to gravity and air drag, the size of the rockets you can launch is rather limited.  You have the further issues of not being able to choose your exact launch point and greater limitations on your weather.

If rockoons could allow the use of very small, cheap, pressure-fed rockets that could be mass-produced it might reduce the cost to orbit enough to be worthwhile.  This might bear investigation.

Red Dogg said at June 29, 2004 10:59 PM:

Waiting For Press Conference Report....

The U.S. Navy will utilize the SA-60 for technology tests and evaluation the week of June 28. The tests will demonstrate the significant capabilities of the Cyber airship to monitor activities on the ground while flying altitudes in excess of 5,000 feet.

Using the AeroSphere SA-60, Cyber Aerospace will provide the U.S. Government agency with testing and integration services for future airship uses. Test flights will take place at locations to be announced in the D.C. metropolitan area. AeroSphere SA-60's uses include Homeland Defense, Firefighting, Security, Surveillance and First Response teams.

http://biz.yahoo.com/pz/040615/59191.html

ben said at August 8, 2004 11:15 PM:

Heres a invention that you cant patent (now).
Think diamond towers to the geostationray orbit. (thank you Mr Clarke- 3001).
Unfortunatly we dont have that much diamond, nanotubes arnt up for it and what ever the matrial its is going to be way too expensive anyway.
So now think hydrogen (helium is too expensive and not as good as H2). Now think of DNA, the double helix with a central wire/rope. What am i talking about? - A ladder to space! Large spherical sacks of lifting gas positiond every 500 meters or so in pares, no make it threes. All they have to do is be able to support a cental cable and a cable climbing vehical and can vary in size, shape, and composition depending appon altitude and requird strength.
Now you 'winch' yourself to space using only the energe required to clim up the cable. (you could also hang a rope ladder, but who wants to climb a rope ladder 100 km long).
This idear is safe because it is not a single craft but many, many lighter than air stepping stones. each of which is not itself criticle for the overall safty of the whole. ie one deflates and its no big deal. likewise if you sever the central cord no problems the thing still floats!

SURVIVER said at October 29, 2005 09:40 AM:

THIS SPHERICAL AIRSHIP IS ABOUT TO TAKE A TRIP AROUND THE WORLD!! (2006) THIS WILL BRING RECOGNITION TO THE AEROSPHERE AND IT'S CAPABILITIES!!

PRXT / CYDF / TECHSPHERE / 21ST CENTURY AIRSHIPS / SIERRA NAVADA CORP

Dr G K Suryanarayana said at December 26, 2005 04:52 AM:

Passive techniques for reduction of drag of spheres must be developed. Serious research should be encouraged on application of natural vetilation as a candidate for drag reduction and stabilization of base flow.

Post a comment
Comments:
Name:
Email Address:
URL:
Remember info?

       
Go Read More Posts On FuturePundit
Site Traffic Info
The contents of this site are copyright ©