November 14, 2005
Obestatin Hormone Suppresses Appetite

The scientific understanding of the mechanisms of appetite control in the last few years has been making some pretty big leaps. This trend continues. Stanford researchers have discovered an appetite suppressing hormone which they have named obestatin,

STANFORD, Calif. — When the appetite-enhancing hormone ghrelin was discovered a few years ago, researchers thought they had found the last of the major genes that regulate weight.

They were wrong.

Introducing: obestatin, a newly discovered hormone that suppresses appetite.

The finding, published in the Nov. 11 issue of Science, offers a key to researchers developing treatments for obesity. In a nation that desperately needs to slim down—the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates 65 percent of Americans over the age of 20 are either overweight or obese—obestatin is likely to generate interest from scientists and drugmakers alike.

The financial incentives for appetite suppressant drug development are huge because so many people are, er, huge.

The research was sponsored by Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC, which has certain license rights to the discovery.

Researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine uncovered obestatin by using the principles of evolution to pick clues from data held in the Human Genome Project, as well as the genome sequencing projects for many other organisms, among them, yeast, fruit flies and mice.

Charles Darwin is everywhere. He's like Elvis.

"Darwin led us to this new hormone," said senior author Aaron Hsueh, PhD, an endocrinologist and professor of obstetrics and gynecology. Jian V. Zhang, PhD, a postdoctoral scholar in Hsueh's laboratory, is the lead author.

Drugmakers could use new insights into weight regulation. The discovery of the appetite-suppressing hormone leptin in 1994 and the appetite-boosting hormone ghrelin in 1999 offered high hopes of more effective drugs. And in the past few years, the influence of melanocortin hormones on regulating leptin has become clearer. But these insights have yet to yield a treatment for obesity.

"There are several known pathways that regulate body weight: ghrelin, leptin and melanocortin," explained Greg Barsh, MD, PhD, a Stanford professor of genetics who studies melanocortin, and was not involved in the obestatin project. "This work is notable because it represents a completely new pathway."

The new finding could clear up some confusion over how appetite-regulation hormones work. Since the ghrelin protein increases appetite, scientists had expected that animal experiments deleting the protein's gene would turn appetite off.

But when they tested this theory, they found that deleting the gene linked to ghrelin had almost no effect on growth or appetite. The likely reason? Hsueh's finding shows that deleting the gene for ghrelin also takes out obestatin.

It's rare for more than one protein to come from a single gene sequence. What makes this case even more unusual is that two proteins from the same sequence have such opposite effects: Obestatin behaves in some ways as the "anti-ghrelin."

"That was a big surprise," said Hsueh.

The identification of obestatin occurred as part of the researchers' study of a specific category of hormones-relatively small protein molecules called peptide hormones. These are of particular interest to drug developers because they bind to a type of receptor molecule known as a G-protein-coupled receptor, or GPCR. "These receptors represent targets for almost 50 percent of the drugs in the market," said Hsueh.

GPCRs activated by small-peptide hormones are especially promising. That's because small peptides, unlike larger ones, tend to be easier to synthesize and deliver to patients.

So why does Darwin's theory deserve some credit? Hsueh explained that before he and his colleagues started the project, they used the genome projects' information to create a database of GPCRs that grouped them according to their evolutionary relatedness.

From the 300 GPCRs found in the human genome, the researchers selected about 100 that had no known hormone partner. They then chose those 30 that seemed most likely to interact with a peptide hormone, basing this choice on evolutionary analyses.

"These sequences stood out because they each have evolutionarily close 'sister genes' known to bind peptide hormones," said Hsueh.

Next, they focused on identifying the unknown hormone partners. Darwin again lent a hand. Hsueh and colleagues narrowed the search by focusing on sequences that have been conserved during hundreds of millions of years of evolution-in organisms as diverse as fish and humans-because these are likely to be of greatest biological importance. They zeroed in on several sequences, including the one known to make ghrelin, the appetite-enhancing hormone. That sequence appears in humans and at least 10 other mammals.

Analysis of the ghrelin pre-hormone sequence revealed an additional protein tacked on at the end. The researchers promptly set out to synthesize and learn more about this protein, which they later named obestatin.

"There are no set rules for identifying bioactivity but most of the known peptide hormones are brain/gut hormones," said Hsueh. So the researchers set out to discover whether obestatin is present in rat stomach tissues and brain. It is.

After identifying a peptide candidate hormone they injected the peptide into rat brains and found it cut appetite in half.

Encouraged, they investigated obestatin's effects on laboratory animals. They found that injecting it into rats' abdomens and brains decreased food intake and suppressed weight gain. Rats given obestatin injections ate about half as much as those given no obestatin. Obestatin treatment also slowed the movement of digested food from the stomach into the intestines.

All that remained for the researchers to do was to match this newly discovered hormone to the right receptor.

Once again, evolutionary conservation made their work a little easier. Instead of testing each of the 30 previously identified GPCRs, they started with what the evolutionary record told them was the most likely candidate. Their hunch was that the receptor for obestatin would be closely related to the receptor for ghrelin. A whirl through their database showed them that GPR39 was closely related to the receptor for ghrelin.

Sure enough, later experiments showed them that GPR39 was in fact a receptor for ghrelin's antithesis, obestatin.

Evolutionary theory has become a lot more useful for medical research because of the declining cost of DNA sequencing technologies. Cheap DNA sequencing leads to large quantities of genetic data and that data gets analyzed with computer software written with insights gleaned from theoriizing about natural selection. Evolutionary theorizing therefore increasingly get used by clinical researchers. This is all taking place against the backdrop of political fights over whether kids should even be taught to take the theory of evolution by natural selection. seriously Well, the theory of evolution by natural selection is incredibly useful and medical science would be advancing more slowly without it.

Share |      Randall Parker, 2005 November 14 10:49 PM  Brain Appetite


Comments
James Bowery said at November 14, 2005 11:47 PM:

One of the overlooked areas of obesity control is upregulation of cerebral metabolism. The human brain is the biggest calorie consumer per kilogram by far and the degree to which it burns glucose drives the degree of vigilance. There is this thing going on with humans where more brain power is required to increase food availability -- and the brain pays for itself. Now however we have gotten to the point where our brain metabolism isn't keeping up with the food availability and as a result we're not getting smarter -- we're getting fatter.

John Brothers said at November 15, 2005 4:55 AM:

Mr. Bowery,

Amusingly enough, by discovering this new hormone, apparently we are getting smarter :).

momochan said at November 16, 2005 1:34 PM:

I think many scientists were caught off guard by (sociological) attacks on evolution in the 21st century, and are just now realizing that they need to do what they can to expose the public to the concept. Better late than never I guess!

When the researchers say that the treated rats ate only half, do they mean half the volume or half the calories? I've heard that mammals adjust fairly quickly when the nutrient density of their food changes -- so that if the food becomes less calorie dense, they'll start to eat more volume to make up for it.

Patricia Borch said at January 1, 2006 2:21 PM:

I have been reading about Obestatin and would like (very much) to work with this product. Is there any way that I might be included in a group that is working with this product?

Louise Murphy said at January 8, 2006 10:21 AM:

I have been reading about Obestatin Hormone and would like to know more about it. I am 72 years old and am SICK to death of being overweight. I have tried EVERYTHING and nothing seems to work. I have type 2 diabetes, hypertension, just had a lamenectomy, lung cancer (28 years ago) and am at least 100 pds over my ideal weight. I was 5'2", now I am 5'0" At this rates, I'll be as broad as I am tall. I don't want to be laid out looking like an ugly blimp. Can't you refer me to someone in the Baltimroe, MD area who can help?
Thank you.

Cristina Ciuoli said at January 9, 2006 7:32 AM:

Does a radio-immunoassay commercial kit exist for human obestatin?

ELDRAS said at February 26, 2006 8:56 AM:

Anyone know how to synthesise Obstetin?

Cheers


Post a comment
Comments:
Name (not anon or anonymous):
Email Address:
URL:
Remember info?

                       
Go Read More Posts On FuturePundit
Site Traffic Info
The contents of this site are copyright ©