November 16, 2006
Dartmouth Scientists Genetically Engineer Muscular Mice

Dartmouth researchers have found yet another way to make mice have big muscles without exercise.

A team of researchers, led by scientists at Dartmouth Medical School and Dartmouth College, have identified and tested a gene that dramatically alters both muscle metabolism and performance. The researchers say that this finding could someday lead to treatment for muscle diseases, including helping the elderly who suffer from muscle deterioration and improving muscle performance in endurance athletes.

The ban on so-called "gene doping" or gene therapy by many athletic associations slows the rate of progress for the development of gene therapies that increase musculature. Eventually the athletic associations are going to split over this issue. New athletic associations will form that allow genetic engineering. Those associations and companies will put on competitions between the genetically enhanced that eclipse the competitions between natural humans.

Want big muscles without all the hard work? Genetic engineering of an enzyme is the ticket.

The researchers report that the enzyme called AMP-activated protein kinase (or AMPK) is directly involved in optimizing muscle activity. The team bred a mouse that genetically expressed AMPK in an activated state. Like a trained athlete, this mouse enjoyed increased capacity to exercise, manifested by its ability to run three times longer than a normal mouse before exhaustion. One particularly striking feature of the finding was the accumulation of muscle glycogen, the stored form of carbohydrates, a condition that many athletes seek by "carbo-loading" before an event or game. The study appears in the Nov. 14 online issue of the American Journal of Physiology: Endocrinology and Metabolism.

"Our genetically altered mouse appears to have already been an exercise program," says Lee Witters, the Eugene W. Leonard 1921 Professor of Medicine and Biochemistry at Dartmouth Medical School and professor of biological sciences at Dartmouth College. "In other words, without a prior exercise regimen, the mouse developed many of the muscle features that would only be observed after a period of exercise training."

Even if you were genetically engineered to grow big muscles naturally there might still be health benefits to exercise such as development of better arteries and veins. But then that just calls out for gene therapy the circulatory system to compensate for the lack of exercise there too.

The ability to stimulate muscle growth would bring great benefits to elderly people with shrivelled muscles. Okay scientists, figure this out before we get much older.

Witters, whose lab led the study, explains that this finding has implication for anyone with a muscle disease and especially for the growing proportion of the population that is aging. Deteriorating muscles often make the elderly much more prone to fall, leading to hip and other fractures. According to Witters, there is tremendous interest in the geriatric field to find ways to improve muscle performance.

Of course athletes will use gene therapy to enhance muscle strength as soon as it becomes possible.

"We now wonder if it's possible to achieve elements of muscular fitness without having to exercise, which in turn, raises many questions about possible modes of exercise performance enhancement, including the development of drugs that could do the same thing as we have done genetically," he says. "This also might raise to some the specter of 'gene doping,' something seriously being talked about in the future of high-performance athletes."

Gene doping will take off long before it becomes safe to use. Old folks will benefit from the willingness of athletes to take risks with new biotechnologies. The athletes will serve as very willing guinea pigs.

By Randall Parker at 2006 November 16 05:51 AM  Human Bodies Athletics | TrackBack

Comments
rsilvetz said at November 16, 2006 11:10 AM:

The dont-mess-with-genes crowd is definitely a pain. In the immediate short-term there's an easy way to increase muscle mass by making a drug that irreversibly binds to myostatin.... or by its extracorporal removal via filtration.

Re-engineering the myostatin gene or doing the old knock-out approach with a human instead of a mouse would also be very cool.

K said at November 16, 2006 07:43 PM:

The mechanical aspects of sports medicine will also have to be faced by governing bodies. Testing for drugs is done now - not without disputes and error. But how much can the body be modified mechanically?

Suppose a weight lifter has problems (limits) in a shoulder joint. But the doctor can now, replace it with far stronger material. Sudden the lifter, never top-notch, moves from mediocre to world-class prowess. What, if anything, should the governing body do?

Randall Parker said at November 16, 2006 07:54 PM:

K,

If shoulder enhancement is restricted to only be allowed for repair then that becomes an incentive to get injured in your weakest joints. The more things break the more they can be fixed better.

In a nutshell: bans on gene doping essentially give advantages to those born with better genetic variations for athletic competition. Once it becomes clear that 99+% of the populace are genetically too inferior to compete at the top level of various sports I think the public at large is going to say "Hey, what gives some people the right to be born to permanent privilege?".

Del Davis said at November 17, 2006 02:28 PM:

Forget the weight lifters and the olympic althletes, the first people to begin to experiment with this will be the hardcore bodybuilders, people who are already willing to take huge risks with their health to get more muscle.

Brett Bellmore said at November 17, 2006 04:25 PM:

No, most people have little interest in competing at the higher levels in sports. If you want to *really* build a ground swell of support to make these treatments widely available, prove that they make sex more fun. ;)

Randall Parker said at November 17, 2006 06:49 PM:

Brett,

The pro sports players have the money to spend on expensive high tech customization.

Agreed about the attraction of enhanced sexual performance.

What I'm going to be curious to watch: Will the sports associations allow stem cell therapies to rejuvenate joints? Tendons? Muscles?

The dividing line between repair and enhancement will be hazier with muscles.

Ditto with neurons. We lose peripheral nervous system neurons as we age. A pro sports guy age 35 could reasonably argue that stem cells which would grow new neurons onto leg and arm muscles are replacements for lost neurons. Will the pro sports leagues agree?

Randall Parker said at November 18, 2006 08:31 AM:

Michael Vassar had trouble posting. He says: How about producing a vaccine against myostatin that works like the
vaccines currently in trial against amyloid?

FuturePundit responds: Might be safer to create monoclonal antibodies against myostatin. The problem is a vaccine would basically create an auto-immune response which would be hard to reverse if it turned out to cause harmful complications.

Post a comment
Comments:
Name:
Email Address:
URL:
Remember info?

       
Go Read More Posts On FuturePundit
Site Traffic Info
The contents of this site are copyright ©