July 29, 2007
HCCI Improves Gasoline Engine Efficiency

MIT researchers are figuring out how to allow conventional 4 stroke gasoline engines to shift into a sparkless mode similar to diesel engine operation.

Many researchers are studying a new way of operating an internal combustion engine known as "homogeneous charge compression ignition" (HCCI). Switching a spark-ignition (SI) engine to HCCI mode pushes up its fuel efficiency.

In an HCCI engine, fuel and air are mixed together and injected into the cylinder. The piston compresses the mixture until spontaneous combustion occurs. The engine thus combines fuel-and-air premixing (as in an SI engine) with spontaneous ignition (as in a diesel engine). The result is the HCCI's distinctive feature: combustion occurs simultaneously at many locations throughout the combustion chamber.

One of HCCI's big advantages over diesel is the ability to avoid oxidation of nitrogen.

That behavior has advantages. In both SI and diesel engines, the fuel must burn hot to ensure that the flame spreads rapidly through the combustion chamber before a new "charge" enters. In an HCCI engine, there is no need for a quickly spreading flame because combustion occurs throughout the combustion chamber. As a result, combustion temperatures can be lower, so emissions of nitrogen pollutants are negligible. The fuel is spread in low concentrations throughout the cylinder, so the soot emissions from fuel-rich regions in diesels are not present.

Perhaps most important, the HCCI engine is not locked into having just enough air to burn the available fuel, as is the SI engine. When the fuel coming into an SI engine is reduced to cut power, the incoming air must also be constrained--a major source of wasted energy.

This design would boost fuel efficiency by a few miles per gallon.

The researchers estimate that the increase in fuel efficiency would be a few miles per gallon. "That may not seem like an impressive improvement," said Green. "But if all the cars in the US today improved that much, it might be worth a million barrels of oil per day--and that's a lot."

The HCCI mode might eventually provide a bigger fuel efficiency boost. Engines can only run in HCCI mode in a midrange of RPMs. At first glance that limits the efficiency gain possible from HCCI. However, marrying an HCCI-capable engine to hybrid electric components might provide a way to allow an engine to work in HCCI mode more of the time that it is running. At what would otherwise be lower RPM operation periods a car could get propelled by electric motors powered by the battery. Then the engine could get started up and put directly into HCCI mode to provide power to the car at higher speed and to charge the batteries. A car with sufficiently powerful batteries and electric motors could use the gasoline engine only to charge the batteries and to supply power to the electric motors. That could allow the engine to run at a constant and HCCI-capable RPM.

Ford is funding this research just as it is funding other MIT research on ethanol turbo injection to boost gasoline engine efficiency.

This research was supported by Ford Motor Company and the Ford-MIT Alliance, with additional support from BP.

Ford's executives think they can achieve near-diesel efficiency with gasoline engines and do so more cheaply. So Ford is not following the German makers in embracing diesel for passenger cars. My guess is that the Ford folks are correct.

We need all the efficiency improvements that can get squeezed out of internal combustion engines to complement advances made in battery technology. Out of the two I'm more worried about the speed of advance of the battery technology.

Update: A couple of months ago AutoblogGreen interviewed Dr. Gary Smyth, director of powertrain research at GM, about GM's research on engines and Smyth provided a look at why HCCI is better and what problems must be solved to make HCCI workable.

GS: Well, first of all it's a homogeneous charge compression ignition. So what it really is what I would call the next generation combustion process. So it's not a technology, it's really the process, it's the combustion process that we're developing and it really is, think of it as clean, efficient combustion. Like the two-stroke, the two-stroke by the way ran very lean and by the way we could run HCCI on the old two-strokes, we're not doing the same with the four-stroke where we are running the engine extremely lean and we're not using a spark plug, it's the whole combustion process is what we call kinetically controlled. It depends on the air fuel mixture in the cylinder. So, we're now controlling the combustion without a spark plug. We're running extremely lean and we need a number of enabling technologies to help us control the combustion. One is direct injection. The other is very wide-authority cam phasing. The other is very precise control. Another one is significant residuals or exhaust recirculation gases that we would take into the cylinder. So, much more complex from an engine perspective but allows us to really get the upper bound fuel economy potential of the four-stroke engine and do that with very low emissions.

The interviewer and Smyth both know engine technologies. The whole interview is very interested and delves into other approaches for boosting internal combustion engine efficiency.

By Randall Parker at 2007 July 29 02:39 PM  Energy Transportation | TrackBack

Comments
Reality Czech said at July 30, 2007 10:57 AM:

This may not be useful for hybrid sustainer engines.  HCCI is a way of improving efficiency at low to mid load, but the engine's efficiency is maximized at full load.  A smaller, lighter and possibly cheaper sustainer would be preferred to HCCI.

Randall Parker said at July 30, 2007 06:25 PM:

Reality Czech,

I wondered about that as I was writing the post. Are you sure an engine's efficiency is maximized at full load?

Also, since HCCI boosts efficiency at moderate load might HCCI make an engine more efficient at moderate load than it would be under heavy load?

Of course, if you can run at constant RPM in order to charge a battery you can optimize for that RPM, whatever that RPM might be. There'd be a gain from that at whatever load, don't know how much.

RobM1981 said at July 31, 2007 12:15 PM:

Interesting article/post.

I don't know many internal combustion engines that are most efficient (HP per volume of fuel) at full load, since the force of moving the pistons gets to be pretty significant up near the redline. Even so, there's no denying that every engine has a "sweet spot" across pretty much every metric.

I've often wondered why the Prius wasn't built from the outset to drive the wheels electrically, via a battery, with a small sustainer running at its peak efficiency as needed. The battery would allow aggressive acceleration/climbing when needed, and charge when not. Whenever the sustainer ran, it would run at whatever peak RPM was best for that particular engine.

Diesel-Electric locomotives and submarines have used this technique for decades, and they are infamous for their efficiency. Whether it be bio-diesel or dino-diesel, 4 stroke or 6, this type of a hybrid seems to make the most sense to me for the next 20 or 30 years.

Ernie Rogers said at May 9, 2008 11:16 AM:

About "highest efficiency at full load"--

There is a problem of definitions here. If you think of full load as the maximum energy per cycle, then an engine does hit peak efficiency at "full load," actually peak torque. That can be found at any RPM. The very best efficiency is at the RPM where the highest torque is achieved.

As a practical matter, engines never operate at the peak efficiency point. Close to there can occur--that's when the engine is close to "stall."

Note that HCCI does not present an improvement in efficiency over other types of compression ignition engines.

Ernie Rogers

Post a comment
Comments:
Name:
Email Address:
URL:
Remember info?

                       
Go Read More Posts On FuturePundit
Site Traffic Info
The contents of this site are copyright ©